Wednesday 8 September 2021

‘Channelize’ your eLearning Strategy


 

According to Statista, Youtube has 2.1 billion users in 2021 and according to the company, their users spend an average of 1 hour on the platform daily. Netflix on the other hand has 203 million+ paid subscribers and the company has seen 21.9% growth over last 12 months. eMarketer estimates that Netflix accounts for 25.7% of daily digital video time among US adults. This means that the average US adult spends 30 minutes a day watching Netflix.

 

 

These overwhelming numbers, do make us question the strategy behind such extraordinary user engagement? Is it just good content that keeps their audience glued or makes them come back for more or is it something else? Experts are of the opinion, that it is the suggestion engine that is driving the numbers, along with the presentation of that suggestion.

 

 

Youtube and Netflix are not just video streaming platforms anymore. They have now become content suggestion engines with the radical advancement in machine learning and artificial intelligence. These platforms are analyzing the user’s interaction with the content on the platform to suggest relevant content as per the user’s preference. The suggested content is further segregated into various categories based on the user’s past views on the platforms, their choice of language, geographical positioning, peer’s choice and so on. The user’s visit is incentivized by this service the platform is providing and their engagement with the platform increases with the sense of hyper-personalization. Netflix rakes in USD 1 billion each year by ensuring strong customer retention with the use of recommender engines, or the channel approach.

 

 

Now imagine, having the same strategy implemented for your learning delivery. Given the user’s behavior on these OTT platforms, one can safely bet on the effectiveness of a similar channel-based user interface on a learning platform. In 2018, Josh Bersin said that research has found out that employees have on an average 24 minutes to dedicate to learning. Learning providers have to strategically make most of this time and also create an affinity towards learning. The Netflix-like channel-based UI on a learning platform revolutionizes the way a learner receives content and consumes it. They not only receive the most relevant content in one glance, but the admin can push the most important courses, assessments, videos etc according to priority.

 

 

Sayan Guha, Product Head – Learning Technologies, G-Cube is a big advocate of this channel-based approach and says ‘When we talk of the Learn Tech industry, the scope is unimaginable for using the channel approach for learning personalization. Based on the learners’ interest, training history, and content consumption choices, the recommender algorithm can throw in incredibly useful training suggestions which will most definitely increase engagement and effectiveness of training. Our channel-based approach is driving high learning adoption for all kinds of learners, from leadership to sales teams to customers.’

 

 

How does channel-based approach facilitate learning?

 

  • It helps categorize the learning content automatically based on keywords which also helps in keyword-based content search. For example – When a learner types/search a keyword- for example, ‘mobile hardware items’ they will find, anything related to it available on the LMS, even from the ‘recently uploaded’ or ‘about to expire’ items on their channels. Having this feature helps learners save time and effort.
  • The channels are rule-based which means that once a new learning content is uploaded on the platform, the content will get automatically segregated in the relevant channel.
  • Learning courses, assessments, certifications which must be completed within a certain date or have to be renewed can be highlighted in separate channel with alerts to the user.
  • As the channels are programmable, admin can edit the channel placement through simple drag and drop to put the channels on the top whose content needs attention from the learner.
  • Learner can see the recommended content based on their job roles, KPIs, past learning records and peer activity, all segregated into separate channels. Just like Netflix, G-Cube’s LMS home page looks different for different profiles as the learner can see content relevant to their profiles and recommendations.

 

 

AI advancements has taken over all aspects of digital experience of human beings – starting from how we listen to music to how we navigate our way to work. That is the level of efficiency and comfort your learners deserve in their learning journey as well. To know more about the programmable channel-based G-Cube LMSwrite to us.

How the Learning Management System Lives on!


 

“LMS is dead”—this statement came out more than a decade ago, in 2009–10. However, not only did the LMS survive; it also thrived by leaps and bounds. In 2017, Josh Bersin had written an article for Forbes stating: “Companies are starting to move away from their Learning Management Systems (LMS), buy all sorts of new tools for digital learning, and rebuild a whole new infrastructure to help employees learn.”

 

Four years after this prediction, FortuneBusinessInsight.com reported:

 

The Global Learning Management System market size was USD 10.84 billion in 2020. The global impact of Covid-19 has been unprecedented and staggering, with LMS witnessing a positive demand shock across all regions amid the pandemic. Based on our analysis the global market exhibited a significant growth of 23.8% in 2020 as compared to the year-on-year growth during 2017–2019. The market is projected to grow from 13.38 billion USD to 44.48 billion USD in 2028 at a CAGR of 18.7% in the 2021–28 period. The change in CAGR is attributable to this market’s demand & growth, returning to pre-pandemic levels once the pandemic is over.

 

The statistics confirm that even after the death verdict, the LMS demonstrated resilience against the market opinion and transformed itself in terms of features, functionalities, and technologies. Rapidly, it developed and embraced new technologies like artificial intelligence, big data, and consumer-level user-friendliness to maintain its supremacy. The modern LMS has adapted itself to create personalized learning paths for employees, AI-based suggestions to increase learning uptake, and most importantly, it created a collaborative environment for learning, even in a virtual space.

 

With the growing technology, management processes, and performance expectations, the need for new knowledge, skills, and even human behavior has evolved. Organizations cannot compete in this business by using old styles of work; it dawned this realization upon not only large corporations but also medium and small-sized companies. Most organizations have a growing need to empower their employees, customers, partners, and freelancers with knowledge, and in this age of information boom, they need a better system every second year to keep up.

 

In an article that came out in 2011, Ellen Behrens predicted that instead of the LMS dying out, it will significantly change in the years to come—most likely to continue including successful ways of providing access to learning across the world, smart ways to measure it, and last, implementations of social features that allow both association members and non-members (learners) to interact and connect.

 

There was a time when L&D specialists, analysts, and learners complained about the LMS gradually turning into a tedious and irrelevant application. However, the LMS providers did not fail to take notice of these complaints. According to Mr. Ankush Jagga, Business Head of Products & Growth at G-Cube: “We have served millions of learners in last 20 years and we have been constantly conducting surveys among the learners and the training providers to figure out what is needed and what needs to be eliminated from the LMS. So, at the end of the day, learners get a fantastic experience. Every quarter, we release new version of our LMS on the basis of the surveys and the opinion leader’s thought.”

 

Ten years down the line, Ellen Behrens’ prediction has come true. With digitization, jobs are changing rapidly, and skills required to adapt to this change are less mechanical and more human. Corporate training has thus become less about sporadic skill development or compliance training. The modern organization demands a culture of continuous learning and upskilling for the employees. To address this need, the 21st Century LMS has thus not become a manager for training and content but, rather, a coach to motivate the learners.

 

Just like humankind, software and applications also evolves. They take new shapes to adapt to the environment. Darwin’s theory of the “Survival of the Fittest” applies not only to humans but also to technology. So, the LMS, just like other software—CRM, ERP, HRMS, etc., have actively listened, made changes, and remained relevant and meaningful to the organizations.

Compliance Training Struggles of the Pharmaceutical Industry – Decoded



The quantity of certifications necessary within the pharmaceutical (pharma) industry is mindbogglingly numerous. Indeed, Pharmaceutical formulation, pharmaceutical transfer processes, GLP, GMP, Clinical Compliance, Process Validation, Global Regulatory Affairs, Document Management, GMP (Good manufacturing practice) QSR, and CMC hazardous drugs are all certifications required in this line of work; however, one should remain vigilant surrounding the warnings of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – the 483s. The FDA provides sterile and non-sterile pharmaceutical guidelines for industries; these are updated intermittently, especially concerning raw materials and other finished products. All FDA approved plants throughout the world need to be compliant toward these guidelines; therefore, to sustain the supply and demand chain for this life-saving industry, there is an ever-constant requirement for pharma companies to ensure ongoing compliance.

 

 

Background:

 

In the pharma industry, each and every individual working in all aspects, from the research to the sales teams, needs certification to perform their particular job; indeed, every task, job, instrument, and process has a related standard operating procedure (SOP). There is also a requirement to maintain complicit adherence to the mandatory information security guidelines related to the specific country or region of operations.

 

 

The training function has unsurprisingly become an integral part of this entire process as each certification has a related training scheme. The compliance related training process in the pharma industry is not only time-consuming and exhaustive but also simultaneously expensive. It is suggested to read this article and familiarize oneself with the process to reduce costs by automating training for SOP changes.

 

 

The business of a pharma company can be broadly divided into two parts, thus: Manufacturing and Sales. Both functions have a heavy compliance requirement; however, if we examine in isolation what is necessary to meet legal requirement, then there are three important factors to consider.

 

 

Course Completion: Whether employees are completing requisite certification training.

Timelines/Deadline: Compliance training usually must be enacted periodically to maintain pace with regulatory alterations.

Record/Reporting: Data management needs to be effectively gauged as well as “drilled down” compliance status prevalent within the organization or specific department.

 

 

One must note that training and certification is a document and information biased process and that 21 CFR part 11 of the FDA guidelines mandates data integrity. According to pharmaguideline.com, “The aim of part 11 of 21 CFR rules is to promote integrity of the usage of electronic records and signatures, such that the data is not distorted, deleted or manipulated in any way which would compromise the delivery of services. The pharmaceutical practitioners are, therefore, required to maintain a high degree of compliance with these rules to enhance reliability and trustworthiness of electronic records, as well as signatures.”

 

 

It is thus imperative for the Pharma-specific Learning Management System (LMS) to be compliant to these guidelines. It does not, however, end there; to follow is a list of critical tasks, all manageable on the Pharma LMS, which can ensure a reliable degree of ease and efficacy in compliance training.

 

  • Categorize and assign compliance conditions in the form of certificates regarding specific job roles.
  • Ensure continuous monitoring of compliance conditional status. Accurately record details of all related activities as way of evidential compliance during audit.
  • Define all requisite conditions to be met in terms of certification, in conjunction with their targeted time frames, thus enabling traceable compliance efforts, which can be corrected if needed in a timely manner.
  • Provide a definition of the requisite extra information when applying for a particular compliance.
  • Utilize wisely the information collated during inspections and audits. Recommend corrective actions to ensure efficacy in the event of certain project elements not meeting compliance standards.
  • Demonstrate to all stakeholders, such as vendors, lenders, government regulatory agencies, and others, that obligations are being met within the targeted time frames.

 

 

Technological advancement has brought with it the ease of conducting business to various industries; indeed, the training industry is now bustling with innovative practice. G-Cube LMS, with its in-built compliance management system, is the one-stop answer for all your compliance queries. For more details, please write to us.


Monday 10 May 2021

How is GCube’s Pharma LMS 21 CFR Part 11 Compliant for Audit Trail Management?



Our clients in the USA, have complained of sleepless nights due to the fear of receiving FDA 483 letters. So, even before we start the conversation, we understand your pain. As many as 429 organizations have received warnings from the FDA for non-compliance related to creating or following SOPs and problems with record keeping. In our endeavor to build a pharmaceutical specific LMS, GCube has built a learning solution that not only manages your audit trails and learner records effectively but is also in compliance with 21CFRPart11 guidelines.


In our analysis of the problem of FDA fines pertaining to audit trail management that we were trying to solve for our pharma clients, the few major challenges that came up in our scrutiny were as follows.

Manual Management

The audit trails and learner records are usually maintained on excel which of course is does not suffice when the scale of the records that needs to be maintained grows. The traditional practice of paper-based record keeping is also discarded due to the inefficiency and manual errors that is kind of obvious. As this practice made audits a tedious process due to lack of data availability, the FDA mandated e-record keeping and e-signatures.

Secured System

In a real-life situation, a big Pharma company’s drug got cancelled because an official mistakenly put a backdated signature on a document. The lack of a secured system that does not allow any backdated activity and maintains a rigid audit trail for the authorities is a necessity to avoid any situation that may lead to a compliance failure.

Huge MIS

Auditing happens of not only procedures but for each job role related to the procedure, training, process documents, hardware and software, external agencies, changes, and modifications in the process. It is herculean a task, to even visualize the gigantic amount of data that has to be tracked and monitored to avoid issues with the authorities.

We have solved these challenges with customization of the GCube learning management system and here’s how.

  •  The QMS and DMS are integrated with the LMS to create a single repository of processes, documents and training related to the same.
  • All the records in the system are validated; no invalid record is stored in the data stores (Database, Files etc.) even temporarily. Any invalid input is rejected, and system asks user to re-enter the valid input.
  • A combination of login code and password is used as e-signature at all the instances. To every record which is added to the system, the id of user who has added the record is maintained. This id is linked to the user account profile which contains its login code and digital signatures.
  • Every change in the system – addition, modification or deletion of the entity is tracked in respective audit trail. These audits are non-modifiable and cannot be deleted, however can be archived by the authorized users.
compressed text only 1
  • The records once added can be updated or deleted only by authorized users. No one else can access the record for any modification. The system also limits the access to feature(s) only to the valid users. Only the authorized users are to view screen and modify the authorized objects.
  • An approval process is there before finalizing the learning objects, hence, maintains sanity of the data. For ready retrieval of data, there are multiple standard reports and custom reports.

With our 20+ years of industry experience, R&D at GCube is always client-centric and practical. With a host of industry specific customization, our Pharma LMS has helped multiple clients from the industry avoid multiple training challenges, including non-compliance.

To know more about our solutions, please write to us at info@gc-solutions.net.

Fairytale from the Future: Facial Recognition



For most organizations, the ‘new normal’ is synonymous to ‘remote working.’ Remote working also means remote learning and upskilling being the need of the hour, learning is a vigorous process with us all. But what happens to assessment? Remote assessment is not something we are used to yet. Though there are some instances of remote assessment practices, but they are not fool proof thus not good enough for desperate time like these.


Traditionally, the authentication of the person appearing for the remote assessment was being done through designated username and password, and also two-factor authentication but there’s a loophole. It does not have proof of authentication. Thus, to ensure secured proctoring of these assessments, GCube proposes Facial Recognition, and we implore you that you hear us out as we shall be surely answering all the questions of high cost and accuracy issue.  

As a client posed the problem, we got into action to research the challenge and that is how we arrived at the facial recognition solution to make proctored assessment process seamless and efficient with practically zero imprecision. However, like with technology, facial recognition has been presented with challenges in its capacity but, GCube’s LMS has countered and resolved most of the following challenges by integrating a robust system.

High costs involved in facial recognition: Facial recognition involves continuous clicking and matching of the images with the ones in the database. Every passing second involves 24 frames, so a session of 30 minutes will increase the cost manifold. GCube’s solution counters these exorbitant costs by clicking the pictures of the learner at irregular intervals (which cannot be predicted by the learner) and matching it with the database. In addition, the FR now is offered as a service by providers like AWS and Google Vision so there’s no need to build a separate infrastructure. This way the costs are greatly controlled without affecting training and assessment.

Improved accuracy: Another challenge that used to come in the way of using facial recognition is accuracy. As the current facial recognition systems are trained on larger data the accuracy levels have increased following the very basic principle of machine learning. Of course, add to this the availability of high-end camera equipment at reasonable pricing which has improved the FR technology by many folds.

Privacy – the bone of contention in the field of FR:  For a long time, facial recognition has dealt with the issue of privacy. This has however been solved in the GCube facial recognition suite by matching with the reference image and erasing the rest of the captured data except in case of a discrepancy. In case of any discrepancy below the mismatch threshold of 70% between the uploaded photograph and the snapshot, the following error messages, dependent on the upload will be registered:

·             MF – Multiple Faces Detected

·             OF – One Face Detected

·             NF – No Face Detected

The snapshots which do not cross the mismatch threshold are stored for the proctor or mentor for their approval along with the original photographs the learners have uploaded. The proctor or the mentor can then access the report workflow and deal with them accordingly.

Thus, we have now made Facial Recognition an accessible technology and not a fairytale from the future.  

With over 100 industry awards in learning technologies, G-Cube would love to share more information with you about our facial recognition solution engineered specifically for the learning industry. Please do write to us here.

GCube’s BFSI LMS: Must have Mobile-First Features


 

According to a study by Mordor Intelligence, ‘The mobile learning market is expected to register a CAGR of 21.45% over the forecast period 2021-2026.’ With the pandemic moving people out of office, this was inevitable but our experience with some of the largest BFSI organizations in Asia Pacific, helped us realize this sooner. Not showing-off but we already did build a Mobile-first LMS for our clients long back.


While one of our clients needed a mobile-first LMS to enable faster onboarding of its 40,000 strong sales team; another banked on this technology to help in virtual sales. It is not just them but organizations that rely on mobile learning solutions saw a 16% boost in productivity and improvements in creativity and loyalty of their employees.

With reports of the global mobile workforce being set to increase to 1.87 billion people or 42.5% of the global workforce in 2022, up from 38.8% in 2016, workers have become increasingly mobile, which includes their primary work device. Now, it is important to understand that building a mobile version of a learning management system is not just changing the UI. It requires well-researched and thoughtfully applied features to ensure security and connectivity.

Here’s how we did it.   

Sensitive Content Security   

Mobile devices are personal devices with a public network connection. Thus, the content like internal data, processes, reports, fund values, customer information and even training manuals vulnerable to online abuse. To secure sensitive content on the device, the GCube BFSI LMS comes with Personal Information Encryption. Screenshot is disabled for all content.

Information Security Readiness

Security requirement in BFSI sector is much higher than in any other industry. So, the mobile LMS comes with multi-factor authorization for log-in. We also integrate with Mobile Device Management suites that secures your mobile LMS app for distribution withing your authorized employee base. This protects your app from external abuse or malicious activities. Additionally, it provides a mechanism of privacy for anybody who are accessing sensitive content on the app.

Customer Service & Sales Enablement

A very large section of the customer service and sales workforce in the BFSI sector is dispersed and works on the move. To enable them the Mobile LMS comes with ready guides for Complex Products and SOPs. The BFSI LMS has a very specific suite to also enable virtual sales.

Adept to Lesser Infrastructure

The dispersed workforce in the BFSI sector poses yet another challenge for technology access and that is lack of standard infrastructure. While in some cases the issue is of lower connectivity and in some other case, it’s a less sophisticated device. The LMS has been built to be conducive to these devices and makes content available in secure, downloadable format to tackle network problems.

For monitoring this dispersed and mobile workforce, we are developing a fleet management feature as well with geo-tracking and geo-fencing solutions.

With mobility and security at the heart of our R&D philosophy, GCube has won more than 100 awards for the learning technology innovations made over the last 20+ years. To know more about our solutions, please write to us.

Facial Recognition is not a Remote Assessment Fairytale Anymore!



Aviation is a dynamic industry and trust us, when we say that we understand the multi-layered issues of training and assessment in an industry where the workers are continuously on the move. In a set up that is so highly regularized and rightly so, training is not a casual upskilling exercise. The training in aviation is incomplete without the assessment and the authentication of the learner during this assessment which is remote in many occasions due to the dynamic nature of the industry.


Traditionally, the authentication of the person appearing for the remote assessment was being done through designated username and password, and also two-factor authentication but the loophole remains that it does not have proof of authentication. Thus, to ensure secured proctoring of these assessments, GCube proposes Facial Recognition, and we implore you that you hear us out as we shall be surely answering all the questions of high cost and accuracy issue.  

As a client posed the problem, we got into action to research the challenge and that is how we arrived at the facial recognition solution to make proctored assessment process seamless and efficient with practically zero imprecision. However, like with technology, facial recognition has been presented with challenges in its capacity but, the FR solution in GCube’s Aviation LMS has countered and resolved most of the following challenges by integrating a robust system.

High costs involved in facial recognition: Facial recognition involves continuous clicking and matching of the images with the ones in the database. Every passing second involves 24 frames, so a session of 30 minutes will increase the cost manifold. GCube’s solution counters these exorbitant costs by clicking the pictures of the learner at irregular intervals (which cannot be predicted by the learner) and matching it with the database. In addition, the FR now is offered as a service by providers like AWS and Google Vision so there’s no need to build a separate infrastructure. This way the costs are greatly controlled without affecting training and assessment.

Improved accuracy: Another challenge that used to come in the way of using facial recognition is accuracy. As the current facial recognition systems are trained on larger data the accuracy levels have increased following the very basic principle of machine learning. Of course, add to this the availability of high-end camera equipment at reasonable pricing which has improved the FR technology by many folds.

Privacy – the bone of contention in the field of FR:  For a long time, facial recognition has dealt with the issue of privacy. This has however been solved in the GCube facial recognition suite by matching with the reference image and erasing the rest of the captured data except in case of a discrepancy. In case of any discrepancy below the mismatch threshold of 70% between the uploaded photograph and the snapshot, the following error messages, dependent on the upload will be registered:

·             MF – Multiple Faces Detected

·             OF – One Face Detected

·             NF – No Face Detected

The snapshots which do not cross the mismatch threshold are stored for the proctor or mentor for their approval along with the original photographs the learners have uploaded. The proctor or the mentor can then access the report workflow and deal with them accordingly.

Thus, we have now made Facial Recognition an accessible technology and not a fairytale from the future.  

With over 100 industry awards in learning technologies, G-Cube would love to share more information with you about our facial recognition solution engineered specifically for the Aviation industry. Please do write to us here.